Please disable your Ad Blocker in order to interact with the site.

Anti-Gun Liberal News Anchor Destroyed in Interview w/ Keith Morgan

  • David Peacock


  • usveteran

    Not only is Bray Cary completely ignorant he is also the CEO and President of WV Media Holdings. If I was in the WV area I would ask my cable supplier to drop his broadcasts from the list of stations they provide.

    • Nancy Russell


      • rocky63

        Well, actually, he did say that. That was the basis for Madison’s argument in the Federalist Papers, which he introduced.

      • Winston

        Why don’t you just take the time to read the Constitutional 2nd Amendment yourself… that’s what the entire discussion was about anyway. When the 2nd Amendment explicitly states that citizens have a militia for the purpose of rising up against a tyrannical government (such as we now have – socialists destroying our rights, liberty, and the Republic), then how are these citizens (in today’s environment) defend themselves… with “BB guns”?

      • CaptTurbo

        Actually, I thought he addressed that point. That’s when the libtard brought uo nuclear weapons. LOL

  • Combat Veteran Seabee

    As a past military man, I can sure say, “He got his di-k knocked into the dirt, real hard!”

  • CQ

    This news anchor is just like Piers Morgan, he asks a question (the same question Piers Morgan has asked repeatedly) and then ignores the answer he gets (just like Piers Morgan) because he doesn’t like it. There can be no “rational discussion” if one side does not understand and logically evaluate the answer given by the other side. Ignoring logic results in losing the debate.

    • Donald York

      These interviewers are enemies of the state. That’s my opinion, what is yours?

      • Skip

        Traitors is a more accurate discription!!

  • pete

    libtards are such idiots

  • John Beam

    Whoever coined the phrase “when seconds count, the police are minutes away” was brilliant, and it would have completely silenced this anchor. Police cannot “defend” you when someone with criminal intent wants to do harm to you right NOW. All THEY can do is report what happened, and bag-and-tag when the crime has been committed.

    • boccagalupe

      The “legend” on the side of police cars ‘to protect and to serve’ means to protect themselves and other cops and to self serve as necessary any one that thinks differently is daft. The weapon they carry and transport is for self protection. Of course if, while protecting themselves, they do a service to a citizen they will take credit, and any medals the force hangs on them.

  • rocky63

    The anchor is the typical liberal who purposely distorts the argument. WHO is advocating that citizens have grenade launchers. No one. And no one is advocating that citizens have 155mm howitzers or M1A1 tanks either. Mr. Morgan is totally correct — the police DO NOT HAVE AN OBLIGATION to DEFEND US. Their obligation is to solve crimes. It could easily take 10 minutes for a police presence to arrive at my house after I call 911 because someone is breaking down my front door. By then my family and I could be dead. The police can’t PROTECT me. They will try to find the killers but my family and I will still be dead.

    • CaptTurbo

      Anyone, apparently, should be able to own an M1A1 since the usurper is sending them to the Muslim Brother hoods. Also full autos and grenade launchers (canisters at least) are legal to own. Most people just don’t want to jump through all the hoops to own Class III equipment.

  • Sky Soldier 11th AAD

    These pseudo-journalists are an anathema to what journalism is supposed to be. They set out with a preconceived ideology and agenda to disrupt their guest and attempt to make them look bad when it is themselves who should be called out for their disgusting accusations and untruths regarding the Constitutional 2nd Amendment right to bear arms by all U.S. citizens…even against a tyrannical government as well as self-defense against those who seek to do bodily harm and incursion against property owners.

  • DebbyX

    Okay, let’s have a rational discussion. Where can I go to buy a rocket launcher? And I asked Santa for a fully automatic rifle this past Christmas and he didn’t come through. Maybe I’ll have more luck with the East Bunny.

    • CaptTurbo

      Depending on where you live, go to a local gun dealer. You might have better odds on finding a nice select-fire rifle then an AR-15 in stock. Of course then you have to jump through all their hoops which will begin with getting an “OK” from the head of you local law enforcement agency. The problem is that the feds have seen to it that there is no ammo available to service any of these guns.

  • BDnSC

    Nice job Keith. Keep up the good work and continue showing dolts like this that they have no idea what they are talking about.

  • Fred Palombi

    First off, no “fully” automatic weapons have been used in the unfortunate shootings in our country. The term “assault weapons” means fully automatic with a fire selection switch. Very difficult to own in most states. What the liberals are trying to do is disarm legal American citizens from the 2nd Amendment right to protect themselves. In every country that has unarmed their populace the crime rate has skyrocketed. Specially, home invasions because guess what? The criminals still have weapons leaving people without the ability to fight back. The final qualifier in our 2nd Amendments ends with “shall not be infringed”!

    • RacerJim

      Let’s not forget that anti-2nd Amendment Obama’s own Department of Homeland Security deemed the AR-15 a “personal defense weapon” NOT an “assault weapon”.

      • CaptTurbo

        Absolutely and, they just ordered another 7000 “personal defense weapons” to go along with the approximately two BILLION rounds of ammo they contracted in the last ten months. Something smells a little off to me.

  • Mort Leith

    WOW,,, and this is the typical ignorant liberal pretend-journalist that is ruining our country today,
    not to mention the same ignorant communist politicians that do the same thing, especially Odumbo !

  • Yachtnutz

    If I said it once I’ve said it a thousand times, gun control is not about controlling guns it’s about having control of the people to be able to do with them the way they see fit. China has demanded that the U.S. disarm the people now why do you suppose they want that. Once they get our guns they will take away our Freedom. I believe it with all my heart and soul. Look up on YouTube Sandy lake conspiracy and watch it then you can decide for yourself !

  • johnnywoods

    What individual citizen has a grenade launcher or a nuclear weapon? Where can I get either of those? Typical liberal non-argument. When they cannot think of a rational answer they come up with ridiculous statements and questions. What buffoons.

  • karieo

    Morgan remains polite, succinct, and keeps pulling the anchor back on point. Terrific job of remaining calm in the face of idiocy.

  • Kerry

    All that has been said to defend gun ownership, without registration or anything like that is very good. That said, are we just a herd, or are we being heard? Deluge the Federal Legislature with your pro gun rights point of view. Our heroes like this man from West Virginia are NOT ENOUGH!!!!! All of us need to be heard, or we are just part of the herd, and the liberals and commie suppressors will get their way. For gun rights, please, every one, Act Up.

  • LLinLa

    What a tool? I wonder if he is aware that an “anchor” is used to prevented things from moving. It weighs and snags things up. He’s doing a good job of standing around while this brilliant Constitutionalist runs rings around him. He has no clue what the Document says, what it means and who it belongs to. He needs to get a job with Al-Jazeera or MSNBC where he’ll feel at home and let intelligent discussions bypass him.

  • dntmkmecomoverther

    Facts and rational conversation as such pesky realities and just piss off libtards like this so called ‘news’ boychild. Way to own this libtard!

  • Centurian2010

    “Rational debate” from a liberal means you must agree with me.

    • Kelly Kafir

      I have a college professor like that. I’m ready to tear my hair out!

      • RacerJim

        Are you sure you have a Professor? Maybe you have an associate lecturer…like Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah was. :-)

  • dandeman

    Someone should set up a website that explained the difference between automatic assault weapons and semi-automatic pistols and rifles. Liberals who have absolutely no knowledge of guns compare the two wrong everytime they open their mouths. Although not PC, I would ask these liberals a question “given the option of a gun or telephone – which one would you want in your possesion when a robber breaks into your house and points a pistol at the head of your loved one?” Quick – you have less than 1 second to decide. Picked the phone? hurry, dial 9- BOOM!! 1-1. The guy just shot your loved one in the head. Now the robbers gun is pointed at you, with his finger on the trigger!!! – wish you had a gun now? Wish you had more than 7 bullets? Wish you had an “automatic” weapon? Wish the cops would hurry up and get here? Wish you have not voted for gun control?

  • Jumper82

    The Libs just cant comprehend what an assault rifle is, or the 2nd amendment for that matter. I hear some of them say a 30 round magazine clip ?? So I can have a 30 round magazine as long as it doesn’t have a clip?? LOL and Morgan is right we should be able to have weapons just like the foot soldier. Not for hunting but for our protection from our government.

  • Jack Parker

    Keith Morgan destroyed that doofus!

  • Benjamin S. Hall

    The best thing we could say here is the FACT that this gentleman brought up – the police have NO OBLIGATION to defend you.
    I also think that we should be a bit more defensive, just like this guy, when we are accused of being irresponsible. That is the MAIN argument the gun-grabbers use – “I don’t want Rambo out there with an AK47”. How insulting!
    Any (legal) gun owner understands that the gun is an awesome responsibility and one that as good citizens we take VERY seriously.
    Let’s hear what they are REALLY saying – THEY don’t trust YOU!

  • CaptTurbo

    Well done Kieth! You did very well. I do wish to point out a point on which you stumbled. It was on the full autos. You relented to the liberal moron that incidents do come along with involvement of full autos. You should have mentioned that those weapons are not the stamped and registered (legally owned) Class III full autos that some Americans lawfully own. I can’t think of a single incident where a lawfully held full auto has been involved. But once again, thanks for a job well done.

  • Pizzed Off

    Pansy meets power. Pansy loses. Which is why Pansy sucks. And what he sucks is NOT power.

  • bitemehardleft

    i think all the home invasion criminals should go to this guys house. i will find out his address and publish it in the news paper and on line like they did with the legal gun owners…

  • lance

    Don’t give these guys any air ! You give them air time, you give them ratings . You give them rating you give them ……..

  • mtman2

    No one used fully automatic military ‘assault’ weapons in the recent shooting/massacres. This guy got side track by interviewer + agreed “they did get used”. The whole idea is to throw the interviewee off enough to confuse the low info viewer with lapses, misquotes, twisted logic not real meat + potatoes w/gravy info…but how do WE get traction in drive-by media? or just unknowledgeable hosts that may even mean well? Ann Coulter lays the facts out quite well!


    It doesn’t matter to these lib clowns, they know that no guns and gun control means they have a free hand in spreading the misery loves company life they want you to live. These folks are lazy, thieving opportunist selling snake oil in order to push the elitism they believe in more of the same and ignore that lessons of history that shows their mousetrap never works but the one made by free market, capitalism and self initiative has succeded beyond the wildest dreams of even the founders….I know that self defense is prolife.

  • Bob

    “Destroyed”? Is this a video game or or a discussion of the proliferation of guns in our society. Hunting and recreational target shooting great. However the 2nd amendment does not codify the insane proliferation of massive firepower in the hands of fools.

Trending Now on Conservative Videos